Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: Single-Core King, Multi-Core Lags in Benchmark

Leaked benchmarks show Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K crushing single-core tests, but its multi-core performance lags due to lack of hyperthreading.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Dominates Single-Core Performance, But Multi-Core Scores Lag

Intel's upcoming flagship desktop CPU, the Core Ultra 9 285K, has appeared on PassMark, showcasing impressive single-core performance but disappointing multi-core results.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Dominates Single-Core Performance, But Multi-Core Scores Lag

The 24-core processor, part of Intel's new Arrow Lake-S lineup, achieved a remarkable single-threaded score of 5,268, exceeding its predecessor, the Core i9-14900K (4,743), Apple's M3 (4,777), and AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X (4,739). This signifies a significant 11% single-core performance improvement over the i9-14900K.

Hyperthreading's Absence Impacts Multi-Core Performance:

However, the Core Ultra 9 285K's multi-core performance falls short of expectations. With a score of 46,872, it lags behind the Ryzen 9 9950X (66,702) and even its predecessor, the i9-14900K (60,305). The reason for this discrepancy is the lack of hyperthreading support on the Core Ultra 9 285K's 8 performance cores, effectively limiting it to 16 threads instead of the 32 threads offered by the i9-14900K.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Dominates Single-Core Performance, But Multi-Core Scores Lag

While the tested CPU is likely an engineering sample, and final performance might improve, it highlights a potential trade-off Intel has made with Arrow Lake-S, prioritizing single-core performance over multi-core capabilities. It remains to be seen how this will impact real-world performance in applications and games that rely heavily on multi-threading.

About the author

mgtid
Owner of Technetbook | 10+ Years of Expertise in Technology | Seasoned Writer, Designer, and Programmer | Specialist in In-Depth Tech Reviews and Industry Insights | Passionate about Driving Innovation and Educating the Tech Community Technetbook

Join the conversation