AMD FSR 4 and AFMF 2.1 Tested: How Much Have They Improved?
Are you curious about the real enhancements in AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) and Fluid Motion Frames (AFMF) tech? Gamers Nexus has investigated. They released an extensive video comparing FSR 4 and AFMF 2.1 to previous versions and native rendering. Let's get straight to the analysis.
FSR 4: Closing in on Native Image Quality
Gamers Nexus rigorously examined FSR 4. They compared it directly to FSR 3.1 and, importantly, to games rendered natively. The conclusion is that FSR 4 delivers significant improvement.
The review emphasized FSR 4's clear improvement in image clarity, sharpness, and definition. It approaches the clean look of native rendering. The difference remains minimal even in fast-paced action. According to Gamers Nexus, FSR 4 quality is becoming incredibly difficult to distinguish from native resolution, especially with larger objects and less complex scenes. This is a notable achievement.
However, the video also points out that a gap still exists. With scenes packed with small details like smoke, rain, or highly detailed textures, a keen observer can still detect a difference from native. Yet, the gap is shrinking. For most gamers, the visual trade-off with FSR 4 may be acceptable for the performance gains.
AFMF 2.1: Enhanced Stability for Smoother Gameplay
Frame generation technologies like AFMF aim to provide smoother gameplay, particularly for systems struggling to achieve high frame rates. Gamers Nexus tested the new AFMF 2.1, and the results are largely positive.
Stability is key. AFMF 2.1 is considerably more stable than before. Annoying visual glitches like doubling or ghosting are much less frequent. The overall image is cleaner, enhancing visual smoothness. This is a clear step forward in making gameplay feel smoother, especially on lower-end hardware.
Despite improvements, AFMF 2.1 is not yet flawless. Gamers Nexus observed that it does not quite reach the seamless smoothness of in-engine frame generation solutions. During rapid camera movements, minor flickers or brief "splintering" of the UI may occur. Visual artifacts can still appear in intense action sequences. These occasional quirks may disrupt immersion for some players.
Verdict: Progress is Evident
Gamers Nexus' tests confirm AMD FSR 4 and AFMF 2.1 as genuine upgrades over their predecessors. They are moving closer to ideal native image quality and perfectly smooth frame rates. While not yet a complete substitute for powerful hardware, they are increasingly valuable tools.
For gamers prioritizing frame rates or seeking higher resolutions without sacrificing smoothness, FSR 4 and AFMF 2.1 are worth considering. They offer increasingly effective compromises that can significantly enhance the gaming experience. As Gamers Nexus advises, be aware of potential visual anomalies, particularly with AFMF 2.1 during fast-paced gameplay.
Source: Based on analysis by Gamers Nexus (YouTube)
